Formally, a restricted bank account should never be a complete surprise: the law obliges the bank to send a written warning letter once the fifth check on the account has been refused. In practice, that letter is often missed, misunderstood, or read too late. A supplier calls to say a check was returned, the restriction notice arrives, and within days a business that was functioning normally discovers it can no longer draw checks on the account or open a new check-issuing account anywhere. For a company that runs on supplier credit and deferred payments, that is not an inconvenience; it is a threat to the business’s continuity.
The good news is that a restriction is a defined legal event with defined rules: clear triggers, a limited duration, statutory grounds for cancellation, and a formal appeal track. Understanding those rules early is the difference between a one-year interruption and a crisis that spirals into something far worse.
What a Restricted Bank Account Actually Means
Under the Checks without Cover Law, 5741-1981, an account becomes “restricted” when at least ten checks drawn on it are refused within a twelve-month period, provided at least fifteen days passed between the first and the last refusal. Once the bank designates the account as restricted, the law imposes a series of prohibitions on both the customer and the bank:
- No new checks. The customer may not draw checks on the restricted account, and the bank may not supply checkbooks for it.
- No new check-issuing account. A restricted customer may not open a new Israeli-currency account on which checks can be drawn, at any bank, and cannot be appointed a signatory or power of attorney on a new check-issuing account.
- Checks already written. The bank may still honor checks dated before the restriction began, but only during the first fifteen days of the restriction period.
- Everything else keeps working. The restricted account continues to operate for cash, deposits, transfers and standing orders – every action other than drawing checks. And if the customer holds another account that was not restricted, they may go on drawing checks on it as usual.
The restriction does not start the moment the tenth check bounces. It takes effect on the date stated in the bank’s written notice, which must be at least fifteen days after the notice is sent. That gap is the customer’s last real window to act before the restriction bites.

The Count That Triggers the Restriction
The statutory trigger is mechanical: ten refused checks, one account, twelve months, with at least fifteen days between the first and last refusal. Two safeguards sit inside the process:
- The warning letter. Once the fifth check on the account has been refused, the bank must send a warning letter to the account holders, authorized signatories and attorneys-in-fact – no later than five business days after the fifth refusal – stating that if the statutory conditions are met, the account and its owners will be restricted for one year. This letter is the earliest formal signal that the account is approaching restriction.
- The deposit notice. When a check is presented and the balance is insufficient, the bank must notify the account holder that funds must be deposited to prevent the refusal, and give until two and a half hours before the end of the business day to deposit them. A check covered in time is not counted as refused.
A business that monitors these notices and responds within the deadlines can often stop the count before it reaches ten. A business that ignores them usually discovers the situation only when the restriction notice itself arrives.
Ordinary, Severe and Special Restrictions
Not all restrictions are equal, and the distinction determines how long the account – and the customer – will be limited:
- Ordinary restriction. The restricted account and its holders are limited for one year. The restriction applies to that account and its owners as restricted customers.
- Severe restriction. A customer becomes “severely restricted” if another of their accounts is restricted, or if an account of theirs is restricted again within three years of the end of a previous restriction period. The consequences escalate sharply: all of the customer’s accounts are restricted, including joint accounts and accounts they operate under power of attorney, and the restriction lasts two years.
- Special restriction. Certain debtors – for example, those against whom the Enforcement and Collection Authority or similar bodies have imposed statutory restrictions, or persons declared insolvent – are treated like severely restricted customers. The duration is set by the imposing authority, up to five years.
The practical lesson is that a first restriction should never be allowed to repeat. The jump from one year on one account to two years on every account is the single most damaging escalation in this area.
What Still Works During a Restriction
A restricted account is limited, not frozen. The account continues to exist: money can be deposited, bank transfers and standing orders operate, and the customer can meet obligations by means other than checks. A restricted customer is also entitled to open a regular account on which no checks are drawn, provided no other legal bar exists. Under the Supervisor of Banks’ Proper Banking Management Directive 422, a bank that refuses to open such an account – including a basic credit-balance account – solely because the customer is restricted is not making a “reasonable refusal”: the restriction itself is not a lawful ground for refusal.
What a restriction does change is the business’s credibility. Suppliers who stopped receiving checks will demand cash or bank transfers in advance. The restriction is reported to the Supervisor of Banks and circulated to all banks, and it can damage the business’s credit ratings, including private bureau scores such as BDI. Rebuilding that standing takes far longer than the restriction period itself.
Appealing the Restriction: Deadlines and Grounds
The law provides a formal route to challenge the count itself. A restricted or severely restricted customer can ask the Magistrates’ Court to remove one or more checks from the count of refused checks. If enough checks are removed, the account falls below the statutory threshold and the restriction is cancelled. The appeal must be filed within twenty days of service of the restriction notice, in the Magistrates’ Court nearest the relevant branch, on the statutory form supported by an affidavit. Before filing, the customer is expected to approach the bank with a reasoned request, and the bank’s reply is attached to the appeal.
The statutory grounds are specific. The court may remove a check from the count where, among other cases:
- The bank refused the check by mistake;
- The refusal resulted from a garnishment imposed on the account, where the check was drawn before the bank received the garnishment notice and could not be honored during the statutory sixty-day window;
- The customer had a reasonable basis to assume the bank was obliged to honor the check – because the balance was sufficient or because the bank was bound by an agreement with them;
- The customer could not manage their affairs due to harm from hostile action, and the check was refused as a result;
- The customer is a resident of an area under a declared emergency and suffered a significant decline in income because of it;
- The bank failed to send the deposit notice the law requires, sent it to contact details that do not match those the customer provided, or the deposit deadline had not yet passed – and the refusal resulted from that failure.
Two things the court will not accept as grounds: a technical defect in the bank’s warning letter, and the claim that the warning letter never arrived, as long as the bank can show it was sent. The court may also issue an interim order delaying the start of the restriction while the appeal is pending, though checks refused during that period still count toward the statutory total.
A restriction notice starts two clocks at once: fifteen days until the restriction begins, and twenty days to appeal. Both are short, and neither waits.
A Different Track: Restrictions Over Compliance Concerns
Not every limitation on an account comes from the Checks without Cover Law. Banks also restrict or freeze activity over compliance concerns – suspected money laundering, unusual transactions, or documentation the bank has requested and not received. That track is not governed by the ten-check mechanism, the one-year period, or the appeal route described above. It rests on the bank’s regulatory duties and its own discretion, and it is handled through documentation, clarification and dialogue with the bank’s compliance function. A business facing this kind of limitation needs a different strategy: understand what the bank is asking, supply it promptly and completely, and only then consider escalation.
Prevention: Stopping the Count Before It Fills
The cheapest way out of a restriction is never to reach one. In our experience, the businesses that avoid restriction share a few habits:
- Track every refusal. Each returned check is a data point in a twelve-month count. Know where the count stands at all times.
- Answer the deposit notice the same day. The deposit window closes two and a half hours before the end of the business day. A same-day transfer can erase a refusal before it happens.
- Treat the warning letter as an alarm, not a formality. It is the last structured opportunity to stop the process before the restriction notice.
- Negotiate with creditors early. If checks are about to bounce, approach the payees directly. Replacing a check with another means of payment, or agreeing a short deferral, removes the check from the count and preserves the relationship.
A negotiated arrangement with creditors does more than protect the count. It signals to suppliers and partners that the business is managing the situation rather than hiding from it, which matters when the restriction ends and credit relationships are rebuilt.
A Hypothetical Illustration
Consider a fictional example: a building-supplies company gives post-dated checks to three suppliers in a quiet month, expecting a large client payment to land first. The client pays forty days late. Seven checks bounce in the same three weeks, then two more the following month. The ninth refusal triggers a warning letter; the tenth arrives before the accountant finishes reading it. Because the first and last refusals span more than fifteen days inside one year, the statutory count is complete – but one of the checks was refused after the bank failed to send the required deposit notice, and another was drawn before a garnishment the bank had just received. A timely appeal removes both from the count, the total drops below ten, and the restriction never takes effect. The details are invented, but the mechanics are exactly how the law works.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long does a bank account restriction last?
An ordinary restriction lasts one year. A severely restricted customer – someone whose second account is restricted, or who is restricted again within three years of a previous restriction ending – is limited for two years, across all of their accounts. A special restriction imposed by an enforcement authority lasts as the authority sets, up to five years. A successful appeal can cancel the restriction earlier.
Can I open a new bank account during the restriction period?
It depends on the account. A new account on which checks can be drawn – no: the law bars a restricted customer from opening a check-issuing Israeli-currency account at any bank, or from being appointed a signatory or power of attorney on one. An account without check-drawing capability – yes, provided no other legal bar exists: a bank that refuses to open it solely because of the restriction is not making a reasonable refusal under Proper Banking Management Directive 422.
What is the difference between a restricted customer and a severely restricted customer?
A restricted customer had one account restricted after ten or more refused checks, and the limitation centers on that account and its holders for one year. A severely restricted customer either had a second account restricted or was restricted again within three years; the limitation then sweeps across all of their accounts, including joint accounts and accounts they operate under power of attorney, for two years.
I received a warning letter from the bank. What should I do?
Act on it the day it arrives. Establish exactly how many checks have been refused in the past twelve months, verify that the bank’s count is accurate, answer any outstanding deposit notices before their deadlines, and approach creditors whose checks are still outstanding. If the count is wrong – for example, a check was refused by the bank’s mistake – put the bank on written notice immediately, both to correct the count and to preserve the record needed for a later appeal.
Facing a Restriction Notice or a Filling Count?
Our firm handles bank restrictions, creditor arrangements and financial crisis management for businesses in Israel and internationally. Contact us with the bank’s notice and a short description of the situation, and we will assess the right first move.
This article is for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws and their application depend on the facts and jurisdiction and may change. Although we aim to keep this information accurate and current, we do not guarantee that it is complete or up to date. The article may contain omissions or errors. Reading this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with RNC Group. Before making a decision or taking action, seek advice from a qualified lawyer in the relevant jurisdiction.